Who Reviews This Well-Water Guidance

Editorial lead: Private Well Editorial Desk.

Primary review focus: private-well testing logic, result interpretation, scope control, and claim-check discipline.

Commercial review focus: whether a page has earned a compare or partner handoff without skipping evidence.

High-risk health pages should be reviewed for escalation logic, benchmark language, and unsupported claims.

Nuisance and equipment pages should still be reviewed for scope mistakes, maintenance burden, and over-buying risk.

State-aware pages should be checked when local guidance changes, not just when the copy feels old.

Reviewer visibility does not turn one page into a household-specific diagnosis.

Where evidence is weak, the review standard is to narrow the recommendation instead of sounding more certain.

If a page needs stronger local or lab input, the correct output is to route the user outward.